JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Amparo Aguirre

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Tercero Civil Del Circuito De Pereira Y El Juzgado Tercero Civil Del Circuito De Bogota. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Tercero Civil Del Circuito De Pereira
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional para evitar la dilación de términos, aún cuando exista superior jerárquico común
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado3Civil del Circuito de Pereira para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial.
  2. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERÍA
  3. Presidente
  4. CON SALVAMETO DE VOTO
  5. ALFREDO BELTRÁN SIERRA
  6. Magistrado
  7. MANUEL JOSÉ CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  8. Magistrado
  9. JAIME CÓRDOBA TRIVIÑO
  10. Magistrado
  11. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  12. Magistrado
  13. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  14. Magistrado
  15. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  16. Magistrado
  17. ÁLVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  18. Magistrado
  19. CLARA INÉS VARGAS HERNÁNDEZ
  20. Magistrada
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.